What a difference a day makes
Jacqueline Breen watches Labor shifting up a gear and the Liberals scrambling in the mud.
Winning government is much
like getting a new puppy. Kevin Rudd has begged, pleaded and made
all the right promises about feeding it, walking it and being economically
conservative when handing out the snacks.
And yet getting the puppy
is the easy part. The real test is when the carpet gets soiled.
In keeping with the canine
theme, losing government is like being sent to the pound. Your owners
voted you out because you were too aggressive and prone to biting people; now all the fleas and deputies have started jumping ship.
The days following the momentous
2007 election have proved even more dramatic than the event itself.
Labor has burst out of the gates whilst their opposition, the governing
body of Australia for the last decade, has imploded. Australia’s political
landscape has changed almost beyond recognition.
After achieving a staggering
national two-party swing of 6 per cent, Rudd is making the right noises. The
new Prime Minister has launched straight into implementing election
promises and insists he will announce a cabinet tomorrow free
from factional interests.
However, the Kevin 07 love-in propelling Labor into government will now meet with the sobering
dawn of reality and responsibility. Rudd has swept into office with
some enormous crosses to bear and expectations to meet. The pressure on the Prime Minister and his cabinet will operate will
be gargantuan.
After a decade in opposition,
Labor will undoubtedly prove a little rusty in the first few months
of government and the hiccups will come under intense scrutiny. Mistakes
made as the training wheels are prised off will be a little unsettling
to a nation only just emerging from a cocoon of monotonous Liberal governance.
Promises that sounded like
shiny and appealing as ideas become cumbersome in actuality. Ratifying
the Kyoto Protocol is an important symbolic commitment, but a little
redundant considering a new international agreement will be debated
in Bali in mere weeks. Voters that rejoiced at the end of their crippling
AWA may be surprised to hear it will remain until it expires, which
could be as late as 2012.
Rudd now has the overwhelming majority of an enthusiastic electorate on his
side, but the Coalition will remain in control of the Senate until July
2008. Political tensions will also continue on a state level, as, despite
Rudd’s insistence to the contrary, blanket Labor governance does not
automatically translate to sunny state-federal cooperation.
If the months ahead look challenging
for the new government, however, they are nothing compared to what is
facing the opposition. The Coalition has dragged through some very dark
days.
The landslide rejection was
devastating. Ex-Prime Minister John Howard became only the second in
Australia’s history to lose his seat. As if this was not damaging
enough, the man pumped as the future of the party turned his back.
In his concession speech Howard
mustered enough optimism to express hope for the future of the Liberal
Party under the stewardship of Peter Costello. The next day however,
the ex-Treasurer and Howard’s rival indicated the he would not pursue
of accept the leadership.
Costello pursued the leadership
doggedly and publicly for almost the entire decade of Coalition rule.
After numerous rebukes and some intense leadership questioning earlier
this year, Howard chose to stay the course instead of giving his younger
deputy a chance to steer the sinking Liberal ship away from disaster.
He handed the leadership crown to Costello too late, bruised and battered
and Costello declined.